QUESTION. When Paul was converted/called on the Damascus Road, he had traveling companions with him. Acts 9:7; 22:9; Should we call the seven appointed men in Jerusalem "deacons"? The first more recent CD where I thought you could hear a lot of deterioration is the Kisses On The Bottom CD. [In this account, Pauls companions here a voice, but see no one.] And those who were with me saw the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. (NASB) Solomon Builds the Temple. As a result, they were rendered speechless. Jubilees 22:16 And you also, my son, Jacob, remember my words, and keep the commandments of Abraham, your father. The men did not hear God speaking to Paul and did not hear what God said to Paul.
He was born in Tacoma, Washington, and educated at the University of Washington, Seattle. Therefore, as we put the two statements together, we find that Pauls companions heard the Voice as a sound . . In Acts 22:9 the words "did not understand the voice" means that they did not understand the words which Paul heard. The third was Pauls Latin name, Paullus. Beheld indeed the light [and were afraid, A.V. He is currently on sabbatical taking a break.
Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Acts 22:9, NASB, And those who were with me beheld the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. In Acts 22:9, they heard a sound, but were not able to hear (understand) what was said. They divided themselves into four bands in the hope of canvassing the whole country with the Gospel. By translating 9:7 as "they heard the sound" instead of "they heard the voice," the NIV allows for Paul's companions to have heard an audible sound in Acts 9:7 without contradicting the statement in Acts 22:9 that they did not hear a comprehensible voice. Acts 22:9, NIV, My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me. This is an interesting difficulty to tackle.
Here they "hear the voice," but in Acts 22:9 they "heard not the voice of him that spake." So did Saul's companions hear a voice on the road to Damascus or not? Saul of Tarsus (more commonly known by his legal Roman name, Paul) was a Pharisee who persecuted followers of Jesus Christ (who were known for awhile . Paul persecuted Christians under the legal structure of Judaism; as such, he was charged to arrest Jewish Christians, but had no authority over Gentile Christians. (Acts 9:7;22:9) ; but they did not . That is much needed because he has been doing this straight through for a long time now so I sadly for the next couple of few weeks you have to put TheActs oftheApostles portrays the companions of Paul in different ways and in greater or lesser detail. Export to EndNote; Export to RefWorks; Export to PPN_to_DA3; Save to List; Did Paul's Companions Hear the Voice? My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me. The account in 9:3 indicates that the companions heard a voice, but the account in 22:9 clarifies that only Paul understood the words spoken by the voice. Max is a small young boy. . Some of the words used in the KJV have different meanings than they have today. report. Greek makes a distinction between hearing a sound as a noise . The other is Archippus (called a fellow soldier in Philemon ). As Saul (whose name by that time had been changed to Paul) gave his defense before the Jewish mob, he mentioned that those who were with me indeed saw the light but they did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me (22:9, emp. added).
Hear me; let me reveal my tale, and you will dash the cup from your lips.'" 3:16) Story 64. The voice then told him what to do (v6). Acts 7:55-56; 2:34; Did Stephen address Jesus in prayer? Only Paul is able to hear what God says to him. According to Acts, Paul says that when Jesus appeared to him he was traveling to Damascus with a group of companions; Jesus spoke to Paul andwhile not necessarily understanding the wordsthey all heard the voice. Peter Culbert Author has 96 answers and 10.4K answer views 2 y 30 And when Paul would have entered in unto the people, the disciples suffered him not. In heard the sound, the Greek word for "voice" () is also used Matthew 24:3 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16. Like when he remade some Beatles songs then (different things on youtube) or did old standards, you can hear the "Macca" voice starting to develop. Paul, of course, was known as Saul, at the time of the
The companions heard the voice (Pauls voice) but did not see anyone. 'The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived' (Cramer)" - Vine on "hear."] Paul heard the voice and understood what it said.
And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? . 3) How many times, in the book of Acts, does St. Paul mention the account of his conversion? Paul fell to the ground and heard Jesus voice, asking why he was persecuting Him (vv4-5). Answer: Heard a voice, but saw no one Scripture reports Paul's traveling companions heard the Lord Jesus Christ's voice, but they didn't see anything. There is an apparent contradiction here: Luke says "hearing a voice," but Paul says, "They heard not the voice." (Acts 22:9, KJV) Paul heard a voice as Jesus communicated directly with him. The men with Paul heard the voice speaking to Paul but, to them, it was just an unintelligible sound. Did they hear the voice? Saul's travel companions audibly heard a voice (Acts 9:7) but did not comprehend it (Acts 22:9), so both accounts are correct. In this place, the words "heard not the voice" must be understood in the sense of "understanding the words," of hearing the address, the distinct articulation, which Paul heard. This can add to the interpretation that they heard a sound, but did not understand it. hide. ii. On how this applies to Paul's encounter in Acts 9:5-7 outside Damascus where Paul's companions hear the voice but see "no man," see our article on "Jesus' Prophecy On Who Identified Himself to Paul as 'Jesus'". All your content will be saved and you can seamlessly switch devices. by: Witetschek, Stephan Published: (2014) "We did not hear the bagpipe": a note on Daniel 3 by: Deventer, Hans J. M. van Published: (1998) ; To Hear the Master's Voice: Revelation and Spiritual Discernment in the Call of Samuel by: Moberly, Walter 1952- Published: (1995) When Paul was converted/called on the Damascus Road, he had traveling companions with him. Acts.22:9 Acts 6:1-6 by Byron Denman; Fellowship In Acts by H.A. 8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? But they heard not the voice.This at first sight seems inconsistent with the statement in Acts 9:7, "hearing the voice."
KJV Acts 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Yes, but they could not understand what the voice was saying. 17. John Mark He is first introduced in (3) Pauls focus in our text is not on every aspect of Satans opposition to God and man, but on his war with the saints. Pauls traveling companions reported hearing Jesus voice (Acts 9:7) and seeing a bright light (Acts 22:9). Acts 9:7; 22:9; Should we call the seven appointed men in Jerusalem "deacons"? share. Export to RIS (Citavi, Zotero, etc.) And the man in whom the evil Paul's companions on the road to Damascus heard Jesus' voice but evidently did not understand His words. If you notice, I am not joined by Pastor Bill. It may well be that the shout/voice/trumpet sound that accompanies the rapture will have the same effect. the Lord, and his stunned companions only heard the voice of Paul. Paul says that his travelling companions did not hear the voice of Jesus who spoke to him (Acts 22:19), whereas Luke says they heard the sound (Acts 9:7). . Finishing Hopefully in a Despairing World. 29 And the whole city was filled with confusion: and having caught Gaius and Aristarchus, men of Macedonia, Paul's companions in travel, they rushed with one accord into the theatre. There you will be told all that you have been assigned to do.' According to Acts:26, the voice heard was "in the Hebrew language", which was of course understood by Paul, but hardly by his companions, as it was an obsolete language. 2) Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? what truth does this verse reveal? Paul's conversion: it seems tangible that only Paul heard the voice of God, but why didn't Paul's companions go blind as well at the sight of the bright light? Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed? he asked them. The theory I am most sympathetic to is that Pauls companions may have been Hellenistic Jews who did not speak Aramaic; or at least, not well. The Shakespeare authorship question is the argument that someone other than William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the works attributed to him. Yes, they heard the voice. . Beginning with verse 13 of chapter 26 we read Pauls account: About noon, O king, as I was on the road, I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, blazing around me and my companions.
1 comment. I asked. 7 The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.. Check out the latest Apologetics Press articles each Monday. The Companions of Paul in Acts Glenn S Holland Allegheny College (18 March 2016) TheActs oftheApostles portrays the companions of Paul in different ways and in And that is the last we hear of Barnabas in Acts. tw m san francisco public library san francisco public library 3 1223 03475 3625 reference book not to be taken from the library ireman vol. A. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. Yes, but they could not understand what the voice was saying. (Acts 9:7, KJV) And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. The root Greek word translated "hearing" in Acts 9:7 and "hear" in Acts 22:9 is (akouo), which means "to hear" in the audible sense but also "to hear" in the sense of comprehending or understanding. . Anti-Stratfordiansa collective term for adherents of the various alternative-authorship theoriesbelieve that Shakespeare of Stratford was a front to shield the identity of the real author or authors, who for For St. Paul's companions are said here to have "stood speechless;" but in Acts 26:14 they were "all fallen to the earth." In Acts 22:9 Paul says that his companions saw the light. Acts 7:14; Genesis 46:26-27; Why did Stephen see Jesus standing, when Peter said he was seated in heaven? "Buster" Dobbs; DIFFICULT PASSAGES: Why did Paul shave his head and make a vow? Separate yourself from the Gentiles, and do not eat with them, and do not perform deeds like theirs. Acts 9:7 (KJV) And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. Bible Contradictions While in Miletus, who was in Ephesus that Paul wanted to hear from ? Acts 9:7 states that Pauls companions hear the voice ( with the genitive); Acts 22:9 says they did not hear the voice ( with the accusative). Whereas Acts 9:7 states that Paul's travelling companions heard the voice, Acts 22:9 states that they did not. by Rob Plummer | Jun 8, 2019 | Scripture Passage, Extended Exegetical Discussions, Grammar, Other Texts. The first is a narration from a third party reporting what happened Acts 9. While in Acts 22 Paul was giving his own encounter about what he saw an - Q. One is Nymphas, about whom we know nothing, apart from the fact that a congregation somewhere met in his house. Verse 9. 4) Did St. Pauls companions hear the voice on the Damascus road? Born in Tarsus, he was appointed Bishop of Tarsus by the Apostle Scholars debate whether Luke may not have used the first person plural Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9, Did Pauls Companions Hear or not Hear.
They did not hear the voice . There are several indications that while Paul's companions could not see anything but the dazzling light, Paul saw Jesus Himself: Acts 9:7 - the companions saw nothing but dazzling light; This same verse suggests that while the companions did not see anyone, it also is worded in a way that suggests that Paul did see someone. Let's not spread misinformation. 4. It is moving to hear Paul say that the three Jews had been a comfort, or a great encouragement, to him. Meaning of Paul's Road to Damascus Story. Your choice. In mark, how does Jesus answer "Are You the Messiah?" And do not become associates of theirs. Did Paul's companions hear only the voice of Paul? That is incorrect. Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9, Did Pauls Companions Hear or not Hear. Atheist activist Dan Barker has criticised this as unjustifiable. We all fell to the ground and I heard a voice saying to me God gave Paul more than he could handle (2 Corinthians 1:8-11)Paul and his companions suffered such extreme pressure during a particular situation in Having named seven worthy companions, plus Demas, Paul has a greeting and a word for two people in the churches of Colosse and Laodicea. Since 26:14 specifies that the voice spoke in the Hebrew (or Aramaic) language, one wonders if Pauls companions were Hellenists who lacked fluency in the language that Jesus spoke. Acts 7:59; Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not hear the voice of the Lord on the road to Damascus? Acts9:7 vs Acts22:9 - The Road-to-Damascus Testimony: Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not? . (Victor Frankenstein) 8 answers. 4:29, 34; John 17:3; 2 Tim. In Acts 9:7 they heard the sound, but were not able to make out what was said. . This probably explains the difficulty involved in Acts 9:7 and 22:9. Since he is underaged to be a Pokmon trainer, he frequently just befriends Pokmon without actually owning any of them. They did not hear the voice . Acts 9:7, NIV, The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone.. He first appears as one of those Recall that the KJV was translated in 1611 and updated in 1769. As a case study in differing views of biblical inerrancy, this paper examines the often-cited apparent discrepancy between Acts 9:7 and 22:9 as to whether Paul's companions heard the voice of Jesus Christ as he spoke to him on the Damascus road. They heard the voice of Paul but not the voice of the Lord. We have a new and better covenant that is not guided or ruled over by the traditions of man. Day of Pentecost. A. Pauls Third Missionary Journey - While Apollos was in Corinth, Paul traveled through the interior regions until he reached Ephesus, on the coast, where he found several believers. Saved in: Bibliographic Details; Published in: Review and expositor: Main Author: Ben Oliver, A. KJV Acts 9:7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. Acts 22:9 specifically states that the companions did not hear the voice of the one who was speaking to Paul.
].This corresponds with the statement in Acts 9:7, that the men who journeyed with Saul "stood speechless. Only Jesus can make us clean of sin and the practice of unrighteousness or fleshy behavior. 19 san francisco, saturday, march 29, 1913. Satan carries on his warfare on various fronts. According to the Bible, Paul not only heard Jesus Christ, but he also saw Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus (not including other times). Paul said, " You know, from the fist day that I came to Asia, in what manner I always lived among you, serving the Lord with all _______, with many ______ and trails which happened to me by plotting of the Jews." Acts 22:9 (KJV - see also ESV) And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. They did not hear the voice. Both verses are from the King James Version. .. They heard a sound but did not understand its meaning. A second contingent with nine men went north, a third band of nine traveled south, and a fourth group of nine headed west. "They were dazzled and amazed at the sudden brightness. Since Paul was a Roman citizen, he would have been given three names at birth. The elders of the church. The incident is the experience of Paul in seeing the light and hearing the voice on the road to Damascus. (We can assume that Paul, the primary source, is more trustworthy.) Luister gratis naar How It All Ends How Does God Want To Impact Our Lives? And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. When the Lord spoke aloud to Paul, the companions heard the sound of the Lords voice but did not hear the voice of the Lord. Does the Bible contradict itself on this point? Acts 7:59; Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not hear the voice of the Lord on the road to Damascus? (1 Ki. "'What shall I do, Lord?'
Hello and welcome, to season 3 episode 82 of the Berean Manifesto faith hope and love for the modern Christian I'm Pastor Newms. Barnabas Barnabas is the chief companion of Paul in Acts. Paul's conversion - did his companions hear a voice or not? He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, `Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? No, they replied, we havent even heard that there is a Holy Spirit. Then what baptism did you experience? he asked. The former indicates a hearing of the sound, the latter indicates the meaning or message of the voice (this they did not hear). If the translation is correct, then Luke has made a mistake. There are two approaches that defenders of the bible have used in an attempt to clear up this discrepancy. Paul's Contradictions of Jesus (html)(July 14, 2010) 16.
What did a voice say from the burning bush, and whose voice was it? "'Get up,' the Lord said, 'and go into Damascus.
save. In Acts 9:7, the Bible says, And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. However, narrating the same experience, Paul the apostle stated: And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of Him that spake to me (Acts 22:9).. These two chapters of Acts tell the story of Paul's meeting with Jesus on the road to Damascus but appear to be inconsistent: And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. Aanmelden of installeren is niet nodig. Cite this; Email this; Print; Export Record.
I feel you can hear the first changes in the 1970's. x.-no. * [16:1017] This is the first of the so-called we-sections in Acts, where Luke writes as one of Pauls companions. Speak your mind, but mind what you post.
This most certainly appears to me to be a contradiction, did they "hear a voice" or did they "hear not a voice". Acts 22.9 - "They heard not the voice (the actual words) of him that spake to me" (implied by the use of the accusative).
A. On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? The description here given by St. Luke seems to be contradictory in two particulars to St. Paul's own account in Acts 22:9and Acts 26:14. For St. Paul's companions are said here to have "stood speechless;" but in Acts 26:14they were "all fallen to the earth." Here they "hear the voice," but in Acts 22:9they "heard not the voice of him that spake." Did they hear or not hear the Lord speak to Paul? - Beheld for saw, A.V. Taking Paul as their leader in this endeavor, the men all agreed to participate. On the next day we who were Pauls companions departed and came to Caesarea, dreams, visions, the still small voice of the Holy Spirit, and more (Check out more ways to hear God). Why does Acts 9:7 say that those traveling with Paul heard Paul alone heard it intelligibly. While Jesus appearance to Paul may have been different in character from Christs pre-ascension appearances, this encounter with Paul was no merely subjective vision, as both Jesus voice (Acts 9:7) and the bright light (Acts 22:9) were perceived by Pauls traveling companions. There are several possible explanations. Your specific belief about the correctness of the Bible or its original sources may limit you to a certain According to the Bible, Paul not only heard Jesus Christ, but he also saw Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus (not including other times). Similar Items. The people seized Gaius and Aristarchus, Pauls traveling companions from Macedonia, and all of them rushed into the theater together. The second narrative that contains a record of Pauls conversion follows a vicious attempt on the part of certain militant Hebrews in Jerusalem to lynch the apostle based upon the false charge that he had defiled the Jews temple (21:27ff). 31 And certain of the chief of Asia, which were his friends, sent unto him, desiring him that he would not adventure Archippus. 18. and hearing a voice as a thought-conveying message. the sound of the voice), but not the actual words (implied by the use of the genitive). When Paul tells the story in Acts 22:9, he says, And they that were with me saw indeed the light and were afraid, but they heard not the voice of him that spoke to me. In the second telling by Paul in Acts 26, he does not mention the other witnesses. These examples illustrate how confusion can arise in the comparison of Acts 9 with Acts 22. Paul heard a voice as Jesus communicated directly with him. The men with Paul heard the voice speaking to Paul but, to them, it was just an unintelligible sound. Did they hear the voice? Yes, in the sense that they heard something. . Aucune inscription ou installation ncessaire. What Did John Hear? 3 This became a reason for the conflict between Paul and Barnabas, because Paul would no longer accept Mark as a Q. Acts 9:7, NIV, The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone.. by Rob Plummer | Jun 8, 2019 | Scripture Passage, Extended Exegetical Discussions, Grammar, Other Texts. coutez Keeping Healthy Talk In A Sick World et quatre-vingt-dix-neuf plus d'pisodes de Discover The Book Ministries, gratuitement! 30 Paul wanted to appear before the crowd, but the disciples would not let him. 3 As he was traveling, it happened that he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him; 4 and he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? 7 The men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. .
Others heard the voice, but did not understand what it said. It is possible that God purposefully enabled Paul to understand the voice, and confused the hearing of the others there because the message was for Paul alone. In Acts 22:9, it is said, "They which were with me (Paul) saw indeed the light, and were afraid, but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. A contradiction in the details of the account of Paul's revelatory vision given in Acts has been the subject of some debate.